Iraq's al-Qaida Ties Were in Doubt
http://www.theledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060909/NEWS/609090469&SearchID=73256582642443
By JONATHAN WEISMAN
The Washington Post
Saturday, September 9, 2006
WASHINGTON -- A declassified report released Friday by the Senate Select
Committee on Intelligence revealed that U.S. intelligence analysts were strongly
disputing the alleged links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida while senior
Bush administration officials were publicly asserting those links to justify
invading Iraq.
Far from aligning himself with al-Qaida and Jordanian terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi,
Saddam repeatedly rebuffed al-Qaida's overtures and tried to capture alZarqawi,
the report said. Tariq Aziz, the detained former deputy prime minister, has told
the FBI that Saddam "only expressed negative sentiments about (Osama) bin
Laden."
The report also said that exiles from the Iraqi National Congress tried to
influence U.S. policy by providing, through defectors, false information on
Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons capabilities. After skeptical
analysts warned that the group had been penetrated by hostile intelligence
services, including Iran's, a 2002 White House directive ordered that U.S.
funding for the INC be continued.
The newly declassified intelligence report provided administration critics with
fresh ammunition, less than two months before midterm elections and in the
middle of President Bush's campaign to refocus the public's attention away from
Iraq and toward the threat of terrorism. Senior Senate Democrats immediately
seized on the findings, using some of their strongest language yet to say that
the president continues to willfully and falsely connect Saddam to alQaida.
As recently as Aug. 21, Bush suggested a link between Saddam and al-Zarqawi, the
leader of al-Qaida in Iraq, who was killed by U.S. forces this summer. But a CIA
assessment in October 2005 concluded that Saddam's government "did not have a
relationship, harbor, or turn a blind eye toward Zarqawi and his associates,"
according to the report.
"The president is still distorting. He's still making statements which are
false," said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., an intelligence committee member.
The partial release of the report came after nearly three years of partisan
wrangling over what is to be a five-chapter analysis of the use of prewar
intelligence in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The heart of the report
-- a detailed comparison of administration statements with the intelligence then
available -is still far from release. But the committee voted Thursday to
release two chapters, one on the role that Iraqi exiles played in shaping prewar
intelligence, the other on the accuracy of the prewar analyses of Saddam's
nuclear, chemical and biological weapons capabilities and his suspected links to
al-Qaida and the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
White House spokesman Tony Snow dismissed the findings as old news. "If we have
people who want to re-litigate that, that's fine," he said.
But Republican attempts to paint the findings as a partisan rehash were undercut
by intelligence committee members from the GOP. The committee report's
conclusions are based on the Democrats' findings because two Republicans -- Sens.
Olympia Snowe of Maine and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska -- supported those findings.
"After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence, I voted for the conclusions
that most closely reflect the facts in the report," Snowe said in a written
statement. "Policymakers seemingly discounted or dismissed warnings about the
veracity of critical intelligence reports that may have served as a basis for
going to war."
Committee Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kan., was emphatic this week that Iraqi exiles
did not fundamentally shape the critical assessment of the Iraqi threat in the
2002 National Intelligence Estimate.
But, as Snowe emphasized in her statement, the report concluded that information
provided by an INC source was cited in that estimate and in Secretary of State
Colin Powell's February 2003 speech to the United Nations as corroborating
evidence about Iraq's mobile biological weapons program. Those citations came
despite two April 2002 CIA assessments, a May 2002 Defense Intelligence Agency
fabrication notice, and a July 2002 National Intelligence Council warning -- all
saying that the INC source may have been coached by the exile group into
fabricating the information.
Democrats and Republicans agree that analysts and politicians of all political
stripes were wrong about the prewar assessments of Saddam's weapons of mass
destruction. But the committee report indicates that intelligence analysts were
substantially right about Saddam's lack of operational links to al-Qaida. And
Democrats compared the administration's public statements with newly
declassified intelligence assessments to build their case that efforts to link
Iraq to alQaida were willfully misleading.
In a classified January 2003 report, for instance, the CIA concluded that Saddam
"viewed Islamic extremists operating inside Iraq as a threat." But one day after
that conclusion was published, Levin noted, Vice President Dick Cheney said the
Iraqi government "aids and protects terrorists, including members of al-Qaida."
Intelligence reports in June, July and September 2002 all cast doubts on a
reported meeting in Prague between Iraqi intelligence agents and Sept. 11
hijacker Mohamed Atta. Yet, in a Sept. 8, 2002, appearance on NBC's "Meet The
Press," Cheney said the CIA considered the reports on the meeting credible,
Levin said.
In February 2002, the Defense Intelligence Agency concluded that "Iraq is
unlikely to have provided bin Laden any useful (chemical and biological weapons)
knowledge or assistance." A year later, Bush said, "Iraq has also provided al-Qaida
with chemical and biological weapons training."
Sen. Christopher Bond, R-Mo., an intelligence committee member, said it was
unfair for Democrats to compare the intelligence assessments in the report to
the administration's statements. He said such comparisons go beyond the scope of
the chapters released.
But Democrats were unequivocal in asserting that the chapters chronicle an
indisputable pattern of deception.
"It is such a blatant misleading of the United States, its people, to prepare
them, to position them, to, in fact, make them enthusiastic or feel that it's
justified to go to war with Iraq," said Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va.,
the committee's vice chairman. "That kind of public manipulation I don't know
has any precedent in American history."
Washington Post staff writer Charles Babington contributed to this report.
CNN Interview
Nov 4,2005: Carter says Americans were misled on war